08-18-2015, 12:39 PM
(08-18-2015, 12:18 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: Like I said, it does not matter. They belong to the Browns according to the NFL. Your opinion does nothing to change that one iota.
(08-18-2015, 12:22 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: We should really get back to the original issue at hand. How far behind the rest of the AFCN, the Bengals are in winning, and why it makes the article the OP posted suuuuuper silly.
(08-18-2015, 12:23 PM)djs7685 Wrote: This is the entire issue with Brad. He can't admit this.
Opinion - The championships from the 50's shouldn't belong to the current Browns.
Fact - The championships from the 50's DO belong to the current Browns. It is recognized by the NFL as such, which makes it a factual statement that isn't changed by anyone's personal opinion.
You can argue that 2+2 doesn't equal 4 all day, but it's still going to by the way it's defined.
So you're agreeing that it's a technicality and they were won by the franchise that is currently the Ravens, not the Browns.
And everyone keeps saying there's a difference between franchise and team, but the entire franchise left, except for the name.