Sutton in a trade down?

[*ochocincos*]

(11-06-2017, 01:13 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: McGlinchey will be there around 15.  So, no, we probably don't need to trade down.

That being said, I'd rather draft Quentin Nelson (one of the best OG prospects in a long time) to fix the interior.  6'5", 325 and a great technician.  He would immediately upgrade the running game.

Then I would draft a C.  

I can't see any scenario where I would draft a WR in the top 3 rounds.

Didn't we say something similar this past draft about the WRs?
IIRC, everyone thought the Bengals would get their pick of whichever WR they wanted at 9 but even then all of Williams, Davis, and Ross were considered "reaches" at 9.
Yet low and behold, Davis and Williams both went ahead of the Bengals and then Ross was selected at 9.

So IMO if the Bengals like McGlinchey enough and consider him as a top 12-15 prospect but end up picking before that, it wouldn't be the worst thing if they pulled the trigger.
You can never guarantee a player being available when you think he will be, especially if it's just the difference of 5-10 picks. Pull the trigger if you like him unless you can pull off a good trade to go back a few spots and still get that guy.