Shouldn't Marvin have used his timeouts...

[McC]

(11-14-2017, 10:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You're kinda just making stuff up now. You brought up Bill and I provided you with a prime example where he did the exact thing. A number of things that Marvin does can be questioned; however, not giving an opponent's offense extra timeouts is not one of them. Can we look back and say he should have? Of course we can because we lost, but he did the right thing as far as game management.

Me thinks you didn't pose the question in the OP looking for a legitimate answer.  I think you posed it as another attempt to slight our HC; unfortunately, this is not a situation where we should. WTS, I'm done with this; it has been explained and shown that the best HC of our era did the exact same thing on the biggest stage of NFL football.  

Did you answer my question?  Was the situation and the time left and the number of timeouts the same?  And I said whether I was right or wrong about Bill doesn't change what happened Sunday. 

THE TITANS DID NOT NEED ANY MORE TIMEOUTS.  THEY HAD THEIR OWN.  THEY WERE NEVER IN DANGER OF RUNNING OUT OF TIME.  Stop ignoring this.

Maybe you need to look back and say what should have been done.   I was saying it at the time and I was right.  Nothing more than analyzing the situation and planning ahead, something you evidently don't believe in doing.  Tell me forty more seconds would not have been huge.