Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Shouldn't Marvin have used his timeouts...
#39
(11-15-2017, 09:02 AM)2MinutesHate Wrote: Once they were in easy fg range, I don't know why you wouldn't call a timeout to save some clock for your team to get the win if the defense holds them to a fg. They were tying the game no matter what at that point.

This. 

As for SB XLIX, Belichick had this to say about not using TO's on defense:

Quote:"We saw that matchup and we certainly gave some consideration to taking a timeout there and leaving some time on the clock. I don't know if that would have been a bad thing to do. It might have been a good thing to do," Belichick said. "But it just seemed like -- in the flow of the game- that we were OK with where we were."

https://www.si.com/nfl/2015/02/04/bill-belichick-super-bowl-timeout

There is no absolute set way of doing things. Belichick's quote implies that in other situations, he may have opted to use TO's to save time on defense. 
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Shouldn't Marvin have used his timeouts... - Shake n Blake - 11-15-2017, 07:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)