12-07-2017, 12:31 AM
(12-07-2017, 12:23 AM)GMDino Wrote:If anyone hasn't seen the hit pic.twitter.com/6s5DBLifPc
— Laces Or Faces (@LacesOrFaces) August 28, 2017
I'd explain that Bufict hits him from the side/behind vs JuJu and Burfict in a line going toward each other and Burfict getting hit in the chest...but really what could a Steelers fan say that and Bengals fan wouldn't think is tainted?
I mean not even the NFL could explain it to the Bengals.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/sports/wp/2017/08/28/vontaze-burfict-says-his-hit-was-legal-the-nfl-strongly-believes-otherwise-whos-right/?utm_term=.d7f0d9be6a48
So what difference would it make?
You literally have no clue.
1. Burfict's hit was both stupid and unnecessary, but it wasn't dirty.
2. JJSS's hit was necessary but it, like Burfict's, was illegal, but it wasn't dirty either. Standing over top of a guy is both illegal and douchetastic.
Both hits were nearly identical, yet here you are, trying to say Burfict's was somehow worse.
You should attempt to extract your head from your ass once in a while, at least.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."