08-24-2015, 11:07 AM
(08-24-2015, 11:00 AM)Bmoreblitz Wrote: Thats the exact reason why it was NOT a foul my friend.
IT WAS NOT A PLAYACTION. It was not a passing play. So why even say or bring up the woulda could a shoulda?
You said you understood Suggs assignment or the DE assignment during an read or zone option. Then you should also understand and know your QB almost always has going to get blown up or that Suggs should have had a direct line at him.
Did you watch the replay at all? Suggs didn't target his knees and HE Did wrap up. Explain how it was malicious? Did he hit hit with his helmet or pads below the knee?
NO he wrapped up
I don't think I'm doing a good enough job explaining my stance here.
I don't care whether Suggs was right or the refs were right (though as a rule I side with the refs); my problem is Suggs knew what he was doing as soon as he seen he had Bradford dead to rights - and he targeted his knees. I don't care if it was a dumb penalty; my problem is with the targeting of Bradford's knees.
Our father, who art in Hell
Unhallowed, be thy name
Cursed be thy sons and daughters
Of our nemesis who are to blame
Thy kingdom come, Nema
Unhallowed, be thy name
Cursed be thy sons and daughters
Of our nemesis who are to blame
Thy kingdom come, Nema
