Patriots @ Steelers Game Day

[BFritz21]

(12-17-2017, 09:48 PM)StoneTheCrow Wrote: Wives will be beaten tonight because they lost in such a way.  I feel sorry for them.

You've had me loling at a few of your posts lately!

This one has me ROLLING more than just my usual means of moving around!

(12-17-2017, 10:01 PM)bengalguy71 Wrote: A dumb rule I agree, but as long as it stands as a rule, it's going to be called every time, at least it should.

How is it a dumb rule?

If you can't keep control when it hits the ground or is contacted, did you ever really have control?

On Around The Horn, they were talking about how a runner can dive into the endzone or just hold it out, and once they cross the line, it's a touchdown, but they had control prior to the crossing the line.

(12-17-2017, 10:54 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Stupid rule but it was called as written.

Not stupid.

Having control of the ball throughout he catch and end of the play is just football.  

If you want to argue that it's not, then you have to count every ball that a receiver drops in the endzone or catches for half a second in the air that then gets knocked out or he drops as a touchdown.

Control the ball throughout the process and there is no murky waters.

(12-18-2017, 10:34 AM)GMDino Wrote: Moving is not incomplete unless he is out of bounds or the ball hits the ground.

It was not indisputable.

But, again, doesn't matter because I didn't have money on the game and I had to go to work either way.  

It was indisputable that he didn't have control of it throughout the process.

If he was bobbling it like that and went out of bounds, would it be a catch or incomplete?  

It would be incomplete, and there's your answer.