12-27-2017, 06:33 PM
Which do you think is better?
I'm of the opinion that the bigger the Olineman, the better the results. I envy the Dallas O Line of last year and the Pitt OLine... the guys are huge.
There was a while a few years back when teams were really focused on athletic OTs. However, I feel that many of the 'Athletic' OTs have busted... OgB being our attempt at an 'Athletic' OT.
What do you guys think?
I wonder if Big Whit was considered 'Athletic' when he came out, or just a big OT.
I didn't get to see last weekends game but watched the Gio highlights, it looks like Westerman and the new guy are a bit bigger.. is this true?
I feel our line is generally smaller than others in the league... is this true?
I want Big and Nasty, but feel our oline is 'athletic' and 'swift' which isn't equating to success.
I'm of the opinion that the bigger the Olineman, the better the results. I envy the Dallas O Line of last year and the Pitt OLine... the guys are huge.
There was a while a few years back when teams were really focused on athletic OTs. However, I feel that many of the 'Athletic' OTs have busted... OgB being our attempt at an 'Athletic' OT.
What do you guys think?
I wonder if Big Whit was considered 'Athletic' when he came out, or just a big OT.
I didn't get to see last weekends game but watched the Gio highlights, it looks like Westerman and the new guy are a bit bigger.. is this true?
I feel our line is generally smaller than others in the league... is this true?
I want Big and Nasty, but feel our oline is 'athletic' and 'swift' which isn't equating to success.