01-02-2018, 03:05 PM
(01-02-2018, 02:33 PM)Sled21 Wrote: The "90's" didn't just consist of two years.......
1990= 9-7
1991= 3-13
1992= 5-11
1993= 3-13
1994= 3-13
1995= 7-9
1996= 8-8
1997= 7-9
1998= 3-13
1999= 4-12
The "90's" were 4 years of 3-13, one season 4-12 and exactly 1 season over .500%
Those of you thinking this is the same as the 90's either weren't there or were evidently high.....
Ya I know. I just think it's funny that "the 90's" includes a 2 year stretch that was better than our current 2 year stretch...yet we're worried about going back to the 90's?
What's the difference? We averaged 5.2 wins in the 90's and 6.5 wins over the last 2. Yay? All that matters is we're losing.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
