01-20-2018, 02:18 PM
(01-20-2018, 01:49 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: If you can't see that the Browns were improving under Belichick, i can't make you.
If you can't see that Belichick is a much better coach (brady or not) than Tomlin, i can't make you.
If you can't see that Tomlin is more a rah-rah speech 'em up coach than he is a technician, i can't make you.
Take away both QBs from their coaches and there's no question Belichick has more success with what's next.
Belichick was not improving the Browns. He had only one winning season with them out of five years. And his last year they were 5-11 below the bengals who were 7-9.
(Brady AND Belichick) >>>> (Tomlin AND Big Ben), without a question.
(Other QB's AND Belichick) vs (Tomlin AND Other QB's), the jury is out.
There is nothing wrong with a Rah-rah speech 'em up coach. Every year a bunch of technician coach's in all sports have losing records and get fired. Every year.
Tomlin has 11 years of rah-rah speech'em up coach in his resume without a losing record.
If the issue is Tomlin is not a good technician coach then that is a fair argument, but as an overall coach who can motivate his players and develop then we have an argument.
I wish my favorite football team had a coach who was a rah-rah speech'em up coach with a winning record that Tomlin has.