01-24-2018, 12:39 PM
(01-24-2018, 11:46 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: You proved me wrong on a per-snap basis where one person had more than double the snaps played over the other
Your right. I should have mentioned that. The fact that Willis played so many fewer snaps means he should have had fresher legs. This makes MJ better production even more impressive
(01-24-2018, 11:46 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: and you completely ignored when those snaps occurred. It DOES matter because the Bengals virtually never blitz on first down, or second for that matter. There were simply not the pass-rushing opportunities for Willis.
That is why I included both "tackles" and "tackles for loss" in addition to sacks. If Willis played on more running downs then that makes MJ's better per snap production in BOTH of those categories even more impressive.
(01-24-2018, 11:46 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: If you want to win, you move on from MJ.
If you want to win you play the best, most productive players instead of fan favorites.
It might be time for MJ to be more of a back up going forward, but in 2017 he was a better, more productive player than Willis.
