Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Draft/FA positional value?
#20
(02-16-2018, 01:45 PM)ochocincos Wrote: I listed WILL over TE1 because their defensive scheme needs a dominant WILL more than the offensive scheme needs a top-flight receiving TE.

Ok, I can agree with that.  I thought you were stating how the Bengals viewed positional value.  
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Draft/FA positional value? - Hoofhearted - 02-15-2018, 02:38 PM
RE: Draft/FA positional value? - Go Cards - 02-15-2018, 02:48 PM
RE: Draft/FA positional value? - Go Cards - 02-15-2018, 04:49 PM
RE: Draft/FA positional value? - J24 - 02-15-2018, 04:13 PM
RE: Draft/FA positional value? - SunsetBengal - 02-16-2018, 01:47 PM
RE: Draft/FA positional value? - J24 - 02-16-2018, 12:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)