02-18-2018, 12:53 PM
And by the way, your previous rebuttal demonstrated the fruitlessness of subjective arguments.
When you were talking about that NE/Sea interception right after it happened, you disagreed with Pat and others said it was a bad play call, just as you had said Warner's was. I doubt you ever agreed with them because you never admit to being wrong. But when it came to THIS conversation, suddenly Pat's opinion was the standard and 'correct' one.
How are we to respect your opinion when it keeps changing to fit whatever argument you're making at the time?
When you were talking about that NE/Sea interception right after it happened, you disagreed with Pat and others said it was a bad play call, just as you had said Warner's was. I doubt you ever agreed with them because you never admit to being wrong. But when it came to THIS conversation, suddenly Pat's opinion was the standard and 'correct' one.
How are we to respect your opinion when it keeps changing to fit whatever argument you're making at the time?