02-19-2018, 01:51 PM
(02-18-2018, 07:19 PM)wolfkaosaun Wrote: Ross > LaFell and it's not even close. LaFell needed to upgraded over and the Bengals did just that. Marvin just didn't play him.
Marvin did not play Ross because Ross was not better than LaFell.
Your opinion of Ross is meaningless. He has shown nothing to indicate that he was better than Lafell. Since LaFell entered the league in '10 he is one of only 15 WRs with at least 390 receptions and a 13.4 or better average per catch. He is no super star, but he has been a solid starter for years while Ross has done ZERO in the NFL.