02-21-2018, 06:55 AM
(02-20-2018, 01:45 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: A few interesting nuggets from the latest Hobson' Choice:
On taking a LB with the 12th pick:
I can’t seem taking a linebacker that high even if they needed one. It’s just not in their DNA.
I think for them in this day and age a spot that high is reserved for corners, pass rushers and D-tackles. I think with Vontaze Burfict, Nick Vigil, and Jordan Evans, they feel very good. But you’re right about depth and I think they’ll take a backer on the third day.
On going after a LT in free agency:
Left tackle is the one spot where I wish they would make an exception in their free-agent philosophy and go get an unrestricted guy early. And maybe they will. But I think at the moment they’re thinking those guys are so valued there won’t be anyone available that’s worthy by the time free agency rolls around March 14. And you have to think of those Carlos Dunlap and Geno Atkins contracts. I would think that precludes a deal like Solder would command, if he’s even available. I do agree with them. Geno and Carlos have to be the priorities and if that means a guy like Orlando Brown at No. 12, that’s good, too. I think by the time Draft Day gets here, the tackles are going to be in the mix up there with the defensive players.
On considering a QB at 12:
There’s no question if they think a worthy QB is there at No. 12 they will at least talk about it. Just like if there’s a corner or wide receiver or whatever else is there. They would talk about it seriously. But unless they think the guy is an absolute lock and is an upgrade over Andy Dalton, it’s a short conversation. I mean, if he hangs around until 12, that’s enough reason not to draft him since you’ve already got a guy up and going.
The team has a much higher opinion of Dalton than certain elements of the fan base as we all know so the last thing they’re going to do at that position is reach. I do think they’ll draft a QB and it’s going to be a name we know. But it’s going to be in the bottom of the third at the earliest as Dalton’s backup.
On local product Preston Brown as a possible FA interest:
You’re right. Buffalo’s Preston Brown is a Cincy kid and they figure to be looking at him on tape as they sketch out their free-agent plans. I think they like how they set up at backer and they don’t go after UFAs. But I could also see them having an interest in a home town guy like Brown, an extremely productive player.
On whether the Bengals will re-sign Atkins, Dunlap and Dennard, and if they should trade one:
They usually get their guys if they want them and they really want Geno and Dunlap, and Dennard is headed that way, too. That’s why you’re not going to see the big free-agent splash in March.
The whole idea behind keeping Lewis as head coach is because Mike believes they’re close. This isn’t 2003. It’s not a re-building job. If you trade one of your two best pass rushers or your best slot corner, you’re killing yourself for this year. Can’t see them doing that after keeping Lewis. They want to win now with the head coach and QB in place.
Full article at Bengals.com.
Yuk! That's how Hopspin articles tend to make me feel. He really knows how to suck out any excitement there might be in the off season.
He's full of shit really. How can the team "feel very good" about Vigil and Evans so far? Besides, in the Mike Brown era we've drafted Takeo Spikes and Keith Rivers at 12 or higher and we took Pollack at 17, so I don't understand the it's not in their DNA comment.
With regards to QB, if he's there at 12 means nothing. Watson was there at 12 last year and he would have been an upgrade for the Bengals. And didn't we get Dalton in the second round? Yes, we did.
Hopson is a moron!
But he is right about one thing, the team will not sign any decent free agents. And don't be surprised if they f-up either Dunlap or Atkins and they may completely ignore Dennard until next year. Or they might extend Dennard early and only keep one from the DL (Atkins or Dunlap, but not both). We've been drafting heavy on the DL lately for a reason.