08-29-2015, 05:39 PM
(08-29-2015, 02:15 PM)CornerBlitz Wrote: Talent wise he is much better than guys like Alex Smith and Dalton. That was my point. As others have mentioned you ask all the GMs in the league who they'd rather have and without question all of them take Flacco over Dalton.
He also looked pretty damn special during that SB run...didn't he? Hard to slam a SB MVP if u ask me especially when compared to a guy like Dalton who has had nothing but inferior play in the playoffs.
That SB run is the only thing he can hang is hat on. Good job you looked good 3 games in a row.
(08-29-2015, 02:53 PM)Nately120 Wrote: Meh, when you compare the number of QBs the NFL has had in the past 50 years and then realize Flake-O is within a small group to be Super Bowl MVP's you might have to consider that "special" in a sense. Or not. You can pretend it didn't happen, I guess. I'm no Flake-O fan, but to act like he's never done a thing to set himself apart from the doldrums is bias at its finest.
The guy has one more Super Bowl win and twice the playoff wins the Bengals had in their 46 year existence. If Flake-O is nothing special what does that say about us? Ouch.
Flacco didn't play well in the playoffs until his 5th year in the league. Flacco's first 5 playoff games he was 1 TD to 6 INTs (familiar huh?) he only had over 50% completions once in those 5 games, in those 5 games he didn't have over 200 yards in any, for the people who like passer rating he had 2 games lower than 20 rating in his first 5 games, but he still won 3 out of the 5. He had an amazing Superbowl run, and that's about it. In the regular season he hasn't done anything special, unless you want to say that having more INTs than TDs is another kind of special.