03-04-2018, 02:51 PM
(03-04-2018, 02:31 PM)McC Wrote: The Giants may take one. But it's not a guarantee. At most, one QB is off the board at 4. There isn't a ton of difference between the QB's. Someone they like will be there.
If they don't take Barkley first, one of the two in between will. He is a special player, the perfect RB for a pass crazy league. I pray to God the Browns go a different way because if they end up with Barkley and a QB, they are suddenly very relevant.
I agree the Browns should take Barkley with the first pick. However, if the Giants are not really looking for a QB this year and Barkley is off the table there is also the chance that the Giants and or the Colts trading picks with the Jets, Cardinals, or Bills who will probably snag QBs with those picks if that happens. So I guess it depends if the Browns are totally sold on a QB and don't want to risk that QB going to a team trading up for the 2nd or 3rd pick. Of course there is also the free agency thing that could play a factor. If the Browns end up signing McCarron then they really need to take Barkley with the first pick.
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ