03-10-2018, 01:03 PM
(03-10-2018, 12:25 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Nobody said Taylor is an all-pro. I said he's a competent game manager who can win with a run game behind him.You did see how, in a playoff game there for the taking, he stunk to high heaven, right? I have no fear of Tyrod fricking Taylor. If I'm the Browns, I draft a QB and hand him the keys. Can't see any conceivable reason why an 0-16 team would even bother with a place holder QB. And that's what Taylor is, a guy to play the spot until a real QB comes along.
Btw, the guy is 3-2 against the Bengals.
He's nothing like Flacco.
Flacco: Pocket passer who throws the ball 600+ times every year. 40 INT's over last 3 years. Not a running threat.
Taylor: Game manager who throws around 400 times per year. Only 16 INT's over last 3 years. Big time running threat.
As for the check down stuff...
Percentage of passes thrown that traveled 10 yards or less:
Aaron Rodgers- 73.1%
Alex Smith- 72.3%
Drew Brees- 71.4%
Joe Flacco- 69.2%
Tyrod Taylor- 66.4%
Kirk Cousins- 64.3%
Matt Stafford- 64.2%
Maybe Taylor wasn't checking down as much as you thought?
Browns went 0-16. Got it.
So...he proved he can win with a running game. What would Barkley provide? Taylor is not "hot garbage"...that would be the guy they tried to replace him with. Hyperbole city, McC. You're better than that.
I remember when the Bengals were constantly trying to move on from Jeff Blake even though he wasn't the problem.
And as to being 3-2 against us, I say their defense is 3-2 against us and he was along for the ride. He's a bum.
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein
http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio singersongwriterrocknroll
http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio singersongwriterrocknroll