Looks like they young Wideouts will have to wait.

[*Go Cards*]

(03-18-2018, 02:13 PM)jj22 Wrote: I don't think Core is superior. I think he deserves just as much of a shot as Malone. And I don't think we've seen enough of either to judge. I do think Core showed more his rookie year than Malone did. Malone played far more snaps then Core as a rookie too (on offense). Folks didn't use those numbers. Going back to college numbers is lame to me since we are talking the NFL now, and once you are in the league it's a new ballgame.

But if you guys keep wanting to see 30+ year old Lafell on screens, quick outs, reverses, shovel passes, and deep routes so be it. We need to see what we have with these young receivers. That's all I'm saying.

Am fine with seeing them get shot but comparing rookie seasons when one had a great LT and guard to the next when they had a turnstile is lame as well. 

Do not care who emerges out of the bunch just need one of them to do so. 

My money is on Malone and yours is on Core.  No big deal and will salute you if wrong. 

But it is probably not going to be either because suspect John Ross to be used a lot ore this year.