03-20-2018, 11:52 AM
(03-19-2018, 07:07 PM)George Cantstandya Wrote: In the last 6 years, the Bengals have been at the lower end of arrested players. Since then teams with a higher arrest record have had success. So why hasn't the NFL spited them for their bad PR? I get it the Bengals have had a good degree of bad luck combined with players causing problems. But going by this chart from the last 6 years I don't see the Broncos, Ravens, Seahawks, (all Super Bowl Champions since then) with a higher arrest record being spited by Roger over that time frame. Or are you saying Roger holds a long term grudge? Sorry, I don't buy it.Were some of our offenders, repeat offenders though? Take for example Pacman, does his offenses just become his new team's arrest blotter?
We need to look at the Bengals at face value. A team with a complacent owner and a coach that doesn't demand discipline and respect from his players. Until those things change the Bengals will always be mediocre, or as one article I read, seem content with serving their fans the same warmed over dish year after year.