It's time we moved on from Dunlap.

[Truck_1_0_1_]

(04-09-2018, 02:45 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Agreed. If you send me back in time and I have to choose either Burfict or Dunlap, I'm choosing Dunlap every time. 

People forget, the defense was looking good before Burfict was even there...mainly due to the d-line. In particular, the play of Atkins and Dunlap.

We shouldn't have to choose though. We can afford both.

Exactly; they will both be signed.

(04-09-2018, 03:08 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: It is close though.

Both are very good players and with Burfict's problems i can understand why someone would say Dunlap is better.

Dunlap stays healthy, doesn't play dirty and can do it all. He is much better than the stats show that is for damn sure.

That's why he's the better player; his impact extends far beyond the stats. Again, how much has HIS disruptions, allowed other guys to get sacks?

That's why he and Geno compliment each other perfectly.

But yeah, Burfict probably makes a bigger difference when he doesn't play, vs. when Dunlap doesn't play.