04-21-2018, 03:23 PM
(04-21-2018, 01:08 AM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: This may be true.
Just keep in mind that this is smoke screen week :)
That said, the reaction to this smoke screen is strong enough on this board that I think Ragnow may be worth the pick anyway.
Glad you are starting to come around a touch on Ragnow CJD.
Hoping Kolton Miller is the smokescreen, not Ragnow.
(04-21-2018, 03:54 AM)Jpoore Wrote: Yeah well reportedly they're also looking at Kolton miller as the franchise left tackle. Let's not get ahead of ourselves.... I still have price ragnow and Daniels as the order but there's a slight drop off between price and ragnow but a major one after ragnow to Daniels... bottom line? We gotta get ragnow or price.
Kolton Miller fits what the Pats need at LT more than what we need at RT.
They are a pass first Offense and need good protection on Brady's blindside like Solder did for them.
We need a RT that can both pass block and run block.
I agree on getting Ragnow or Price, these are the two Centers that fit what Pollack has been talking about.
Ragnow gets the edge for me everytime though, healthy, ready to go with long arms and out of the SEC.
(04-21-2018, 06:02 AM)psychdoctor Wrote: I think OT>Center. WTS, if McGlinchey is there at 21 they will go with Notre Dame OT first then take Price in round 2. If McLinchey is gone, they may go Ragnow at 21 or Payne DT.
I would love this:
Glenn-Boling-Price-Westerman-McGlinchey
Best Center in a good Center class>over decent OT in a poor Tackle class for me.
I would love this:
Glenn-Boling-Ragnow-Westerman-Orlando Brown/Tyrell Crosby/Alex Cappa/Jimarco Jones
Too much risk in waiting on one of the top 3 Centers to fall to us in the 2nd round IMHO.
(04-21-2018, 06:22 AM)Bilbo Saggins Wrote: I think that the choice may boil down to this: would you rather have a tackle who will range from a C+ to a B starter, or would you rather have a center who will who will range from a B+ to an A+ starter?
Mcglinchy will likely be gone. Interior o-line play is really important these days and the line really is only as strong as the weakest link.
Spot on Bilbo.
(04-21-2018, 11:13 AM)BenZoo2 Wrote: I would generally agree with you on the ot>c part. It doesn't appear that there is that dominant ot this year. The top 3 centers this year offer position versatility at ot as well. Personally I think if you can play c you can play og too, but i digress.
I think the bengals can get a tackle in 2-3 bit the top 3 centers may be gone by 46. We haven't had good c play in at least 4 years. And typically when we've had a good line we've had good center play.
You know it Zoo.
