04-25-2018, 11:53 AM
(04-24-2018, 06:56 PM)wolverine515151 Wrote: I use it because it is much more detailed than a one size fits all qb formula that puts a huge emphasis on the td and where the ball was thrown.
More detailed, sure. More subjective, definitely, which makes it MORE flawed.
Also the NFL QB rating places NO emphasis on where the ball was thrown.
(04-24-2018, 06:56 PM)wolverine515151 Wrote: It breaks the windows down into several categories and that takes out a lot of its subjectivity.
Having "windows" is the very definition of subjectivity. Having windows makes it a LOT more subjective than the QB rating formula. You're putting more weight on a more flawed formula and shitting on a less flawed formula.
(04-24-2018, 06:56 PM)wolverine515151 Wrote: Never ever did I say it was a perfect formula. If I have to choose between two flawed formulas I'll choose the one that is less flawed.
If you're using brickwallblitz's formula, you absolutely are NOT using the less flawed one.