PFF #3, Late

[*SHRacerX*]

(09-03-2015, 08:54 AM)djs7685 Wrote: 1. Seems like you have a loose definition of "very successful NFL career". Let's pretend that he had a great career, what does that mean for today? Hunt didn't line up against him 4 years ago, it was just a week or two ago. He's not good right now, so saying "former first round pick" is very misleading.

2. He can't. He's not good. Please don't use PFF grades as proof of your claim because then I'm going to have to hold that against you and make you look like a complete hypocrite. You constantly defend players that grade out poorly, so let's not pretend that PFF should matter in your opinion. You can't just pull PFF numbers as proof when it's convenient and then ignore them otherwise.

3. Your really strong opinion is a really strong opinion because you're one of the very few defending Hunt in the manner that you consistently do from thread to thread. Other people have called you out on your bias too, so I'm not the only one that sees it. Hunt isn't good, and if you think he is after isolating his snaps, I no longer value your opinion whatsoever when it comes to 4-3 DEs. The only thing you seem to be getting right is that he will make the team, but only because the team won't give up on the Hunt project quite yet. Dunlap is a 3 down guy, he plays 85% of the team's snaps. This d-line wants to run a rotation, yes, but Dunlap isn't one of the guys moving very often.

1.) My line of "former first round pick" is misleading?  He was selected 18th overall and his SECOND NFL CONTRACT was for 3 yrs/35 million.  You equate that to Ryan Leaf and I'm being misleading?  Hello Kettle?  You're black!

2.)My use of PFF is just like anyone else's.  They are supposed to be an objective measure.  And here is the "you constantly" and "you pull them out"  and "you ignore" and a threat of using my use of those numbers against my argument that Hunt has simply "played well".  Everyone was loving what they saw from Carter (myself included) and hammering Hunt for doing "nothing" when Carter was rated a +.6 and Hunt was rated a +.4.  Why is that not at least a valid comparison?  Hunt was also asked to defend the run as well as rush the passer.  Carter was lined up to rush the passer only.  I think Hunt showed well in both facets.  You don't.  That's fine.  But what is with the attacks of me supporting Hunt?  You talk about my overwhelming "bias" when you kill the guy and say "he can't rush the passer, he can't stop the run".  What did he ever do to you?  Steal your lunch money?

3.) I don't care if I am "one of the only ones supporting Hunt" and I sure as hell don't give a crap if you "no longer value my opinion whatsoever".  OUCH!  That hurts!  Please, please...value my opinion!  I need your love.  Without it, I have no value in this world.  Jesus, aren't you just a little full of yourself?