Poll: Should the Bengals have traded up past DET to get Ragnow?
Yes!
No, Price is fine and the extra pick(s) not worth giving up
[Show Results]
 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If Ragnow was really the target at 21...
#63
(05-03-2018, 12:38 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: Im sorry, but you just have know way of knowing that. 

A LOT of evaluators had Ragnow better than Price. Some had Price better than Ragnow. 

To say that its "lunacy" that some people think Ragnow is better than Price is not really lunacy. 

Ragnow was considered a 3rd round pick until late in the process...  With Price hurt he rose on draft boards.

Price was generally a consensus first rounder till he got hurt at the combine
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - XenoMorph - 05-04-2018, 02:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)