Poll: Should the Bengals have traded up past DET to get Ragnow?
Yes!
No, Price is fine and the extra pick(s) not worth giving up
[Show Results]
 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If Ragnow was really the target at 21...
#83
(05-07-2018, 01:21 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: True about the bone spurs Shake. Glenn is ready to go.

I doubt the Lions will have Ragnow playing Guard. They have a nobody at Center.

Ragnow was a great Center at Arkansas and played Center multiple years in the SEC unlike Price who played Center
just last year. One year. We got the more talented, raw Center prospect.

I don't see Price as raw. He started 55 straight games along the interior. He won the Rimington, so I'd say his transition to Center went over smoothly. Sure, Ragnow started 33 games at Center and Price started 14, but I wouldn't call Price raw. 

Also, one thing I just noticed is that Ragnow is over 6'5". Almost 1.5 inches taller than Price. Isn't it better for Centers to be on the shorter side?
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - Shake n Blake - 05-07-2018, 02:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)