Tier 3 QB

[*bfine32*]

(07-28-2018, 11:13 PM)fredtoast Wrote: My point is that they are ranked ahead of him because career numbers are more important than a small sample size.

If sample size did not matter you would have to rank Watson ahead of those guys.

They are ranked ahead of him because they are among the greatest of all time. Of course sample size matters; it just doesn't automatically put you ahead of the younger players simply because you've been around.

You still didn't answer any of these questions:

Should Flacco be above Wentz?


Should Bortles be above Watson?

Should McCown be above Goff?

Should Tannehill be above Jimmy G?


I will assume your answer is yes because of sample size.