Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sports Illustrated projection
#60
(09-07-2015, 12:21 PM)PDub80 Wrote: - The SI piece is absolutely so far off based on what we see and know today. Is it possible? Of course. Probable enough to predict? No freaking way.

- I think Utts is completely entitled to have post his opinion without being attacked by people. Frankly, with the strength of schedule, injury possibilities, and the inconsistent QB play I can understand why someone would think that 8-8 is possible. The Bengals D is one roll up on Geno's knee from falling down to the 20's again.

- I wish people would keep an open mind and ask questions as to why people think or view the team, plays, FO, etc. certain ways rather than attack the messenger or purposefully misconstrue someone's intent in a post to try and have a "Gotcha!" moment. It's almost as if someone saying they were wrong or acknowledging someone else having a good point or has helped change their opinion means they actually lost some sort of competition as to who the smartest Bengals fan is. NEWS FLASH: We're life long Bengals fans... We're all sort of idiots in our own way.

Choose Your Own Adventure Time....

1: AD is the QB: They post a 12-4 record giving them a first round bye and home field only they go one & done again.
2: AJMac is the QB (due to injury): The Bengals go 10-6 but find post season success. AJMac goes on to become the Bengals version of Tom Brady and leads the team to the Superbowl.

Bold prediction.... Scenario #2 becomes reality.

McCarron would then be the first Alabama QB to be worth spit in the NFL for quite some time. Bold? I'm not quite sure it's bold unless you spell bold as LOL.
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"

Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.


[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Sports Illustrated projection - fredtoast - 09-05-2015, 03:12 AM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - McC - 09-05-2015, 09:46 AM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - McC - 09-05-2015, 10:16 AM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - McC - 09-05-2015, 09:34 AM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - jason - 09-05-2015, 11:54 AM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - Beaker - 09-05-2015, 11:59 AM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - jason - 09-05-2015, 03:07 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - jason - 09-05-2015, 08:23 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - Utts - 09-05-2015, 02:37 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - McC - 09-05-2015, 03:12 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - Utts - 09-05-2015, 11:22 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - Utts - 09-06-2015, 01:34 AM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - McC - 09-06-2015, 10:34 AM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - Utts - 09-06-2015, 03:18 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - McC - 09-06-2015, 03:34 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - Utts - 09-06-2015, 02:53 AM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - Utts - 09-06-2015, 03:20 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - Beaker - 09-05-2015, 03:25 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - PDub80 - 09-07-2015, 12:21 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - grampahol - 09-07-2015, 12:28 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - PDub80 - 09-07-2015, 01:03 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - jason - 09-07-2015, 08:34 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - PDub80 - 09-08-2015, 09:57 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - PDub80 - 09-07-2015, 03:50 PM
RE: Sports Illustrated projection - jason - 09-07-2015, 08:30 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)