Driskell vs Barkley

[*PhilHos*]

(08-10-2018, 02:50 PM)bengalguy71 Wrote: It DOES matter because they are the HC and Owner.  History or no history, they have the final say so.  They might ask for Lazor's opinion, but final say so is up to them.

I'm confused. You asked what they most likely will do. Based on their history, they're NOT going to go with unproven (in the regular season) Driskel over Barkley who they signed because of his previous relationship with Lazor.

Even last year, i thought Driskel should have been the primary backup and that hasn't changed. But, if you want to know what Merv and Mike are going to do, it's go with the "proven" QB with a relationship to the OC.