Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Driskel should be backup QB
#5
(08-19-2018, 12:37 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: Great point.

Barkley will not be signed elsewhere if released...

Even if he is picked up by another team, I just can't imagine anyone looking back at 2018 and saying "The Bengals' season was blown when they cut Matt Barkley." There is more of a (super slim) chance people say "The Bengals never should have cut the AMAZIN' Jeff Driskel, seeing what he's become for INSERT OTHER TEAM HERE in these past years!"
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - Nately120 - 08-19-2018, 12:38 PM
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - Go Cards - 08-19-2018, 12:26 PM
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - Luvnit2 - 08-20-2018, 12:11 PM
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - bfine32 - 08-19-2018, 09:07 PM
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - jason - 08-19-2018, 10:54 PM
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - Go Cards - 08-20-2018, 02:57 AM
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - JWW1971 - 08-20-2018, 02:19 AM
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - dr1441 - 08-20-2018, 09:26 AM
Driskel should be backup QB - BenZoo2 - 08-20-2018, 10:46 AM
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - Goalpost - 08-20-2018, 11:40 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)