08-20-2018, 02:21 PM
(08-20-2018, 12:52 PM)Au165 Wrote: That doesn't work because the minimum spend still requires the moving average over three years to reach a certain average. Rolled over money does not count as spending in this accounting so this theory here is false. It is also known that they have spend up to the ceiling a couple times. The narrative that they are pocketing money is a broken and played out narrative over the last couple years.
The minimum spend is always met, but never the maximum - never. That is money in the pocket. But I have said many times on another forum that I have little issue with the way they manage the cap. My issue is with the coaching and how the roster is managed. But there is no doubt staying below the cap every year and utilizing the rollover provisions pockets money for the owner, even the deferral of monies onto the next year pockets interest income.
Fredtoast + Ignore = Forum bliss
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)