09-01-2018, 01:31 AM
(09-01-2018, 12:03 AM)BengalChris Wrote: It's not the per year that Whit wanted. He wanted the multi year deal and the Bengals OL sure could have used him. He's still better than Glenn, not that Glenn is bad or anything like that, but Whit is just better and was last year and will be this year as well.
While Whit was still good last year, his play declined. It's not a slam dunk to say he will better than Glenn this year.
Your original argument was that Whit was "low balled" and it would have only taken a "decent contract" to keep him here. He wasn't "low balled" and a one year, $10 mil deal is a great contract for a 35 year old offensive lineman. He was able to get more, and more power to him, but that's a false narrative.