Uh yeah Tate can go on the practice squad (sarcasm)

[*ochocincos*]

(08-29-2018, 11:03 PM)bfine32 Wrote: The "cheaper" aspect is ridiculous. The difference is about 150k. What leads you to believe Tate has more upside; cause he's taller? As to the rest; you lost me.

I think part of the reason for optimism with state compared to Core is Core has been in league two full seasons and had 0 receptions last year. So people assume he’s not good because he didn’t progress on offense from Year 1 to 2. As for Tate, he’s an unknown, so people are just assuming he’ll follow same path in NFL as he did in college.

And when comparing both Core’s and Tate’s two years as a starter in college, Core had about 250 more yards but six less TDs than Tate. Given the Bengals were so bad scoring TDs last year, people naturally feel Tate’s skill set should benefit the Bengals more than Core’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk