09-10-2015, 11:12 AM
(09-10-2015, 11:07 AM)djs7685 Wrote: But why wouldn't you add the TEs against the #1 receivers instead of the #2 receivers? Wouldn't that make more sense for teams like the Patriots and Seahawks at least? Gronk and Graham are much more comparable to #1s than #2s. In fact, they're easily the best receiver on their respective teams, so if anything you should be throwing them up on the #1 list.
That's what I was saying about this becoming awfully confusing if you don't compare them at their given positions.
You would, but then it would drop their WR1 down to #2 receiver.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)