Bengals offense has some nice weapons

[Brownshoe]

(09-10-2015, 11:13 AM)djs7685 Wrote: Plus, a lot of teams do run 2 TE sets and have their 3rd WR on the field less than others, ala what we will be seeing a lot of from the Colts this year. I can see both Fleener and Allen seeing more playing time than Moncrief, so I completely understand where you're coming from with this.

Then you have to factor in how much PT each guy gets and go from there I suppose. Does it matter if our backup running back is better than their backup running back if theirs rarely sees the field? I would say it doesn't matter as much, but then we have to decide how much to weigh that.

I'm sure we could come up with a legitimate system that would work for this, but I feel like that would be a ton of work for something that doesn't matter all that much

Well for the running backs I guess you could combine them. There still will be single RBs like Peterson and Bell that will do just as well as most teams two RBs combined. I really only can think of two great duo RBs in the league atm and it's Hill + Gio and Murray + Sproles. That's just off the top of my head. I think that you should separate the running game from the receiving game, and compare it that way. I think it could get too confusing if you combine the run game + the pass game.