Dalton since Lazor took over as OC

[*rfaulk34*]

(09-15-2018, 02:36 PM)YsCascadia Wrote: Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.  It shows your inability to understand what is written.

Since we are going back into last season we aren't 2-0 we are actually 4-0.  I mean why not go back to last year right?  Who cares about things like through the whole course of a season.  No let's start in week 2 of last year and go through to week 2 of this year.  See how silly that is?

The stats that count on whether or not Dalton is any good are the career stats that I posted.  Now since the NFL is a win NOW and not last year,  Then the only real stats for this year that matter are these last 2 games.  Or are you just not capable of understanding how a person's career stats in relation to the current season stats are to be viewed?

As to how a coach having a difference on the way a QB plays is why I say Brady is a system QB.  If he wants the GOAT title he needs to leave NE and play for the Chargers or some other team. 

As to the relevance of Lazor taking over?  It isn't relevant.  A OC influences the whole team... you want to talk about Lazor then post the offenses totals for the time he took over, Rushing TDs, Turnovers, 1st downs, 3rd down Conv. 4th down Conv.  4th quarter comebacks.  % of having the lead in the 4th and then losing the game.  Then you can go back to the 2nd game of last year. 

Using Dalton just shows that the cherry picking is only to hype Dalton up.  If you don't understand that then maybe you should try to focus more learning about football then trying to be witty on the message board.

Fred cherry picked, or as BFine put it, selectively picked, I called him out on it.  Said I didn't want to argue.  Leave it at that.  STFU with trying to sound smart, because you don't have the ability for it.

You shouldn't question comprehension, when you display a lack of it. I'm not coming at you, just saying...it's perfectly reasonable to take a consecutive 16 game stretch when there are stats to show a hypothesis correct. Lazor was the OC for the last 14 games of last year and the first 2 of this year. Since there are 16 games in a season, it's perfectly reasonable to show how, in this case, a QBs performance has been better under the new OC. 

The QB play the first 2 games, along with the entire offense, was BAD last year. If you want to get nit-picky, it might have made more sense to take Zamp's last 16 games and compare them to Lazor's first 16 games, but it wasn't really necessary to make the point.