Dalton since Lazor took over as OC

[Shake n Blake]

(09-14-2018, 04:21 PM)McC Wrote: He might have put the primetime narrative to bed last night too.

That will stick to him forever, unfortunately.

Since the 2.0 game, Dalton has played 12 prime-time games. 3/4 of season's worth. His stats?

267/423 (63.1%)
2911 yards (243 per game)
19 TDs to 7 INTs
91.4 rating

(09-14-2018, 05:11 PM)BengalChris Wrote: No one could defend last year's start. No one can really defend Dalton's playoff stats either, they are just plain bad (1TD, 6INTs, 4FUMs, 0 wins, 4 losses).

But, it is a team game and it's not just Dalton. Last night Boyd prevented an interception on a bad throw, which helped out Dalton's stat line. The D has put the closing marks on both of these first two games this year.

To Dalton's credit he has turned his play around from last year's start. Maybe he'll do the same come playoff time this year.

Most of us, self included, wanted Marv gone after last year. But it turned out better that we kept him.

...and you can just as easily point out that our WRs have caused some INT's. It all balances out in the end.

(09-14-2018, 06:29 PM)YsCascadia Wrote: No... I don't need to look up Cherry picking...  as I said, I am not interested in arguing.  You can continue cherry picking to your hearts content.

(09-14-2018, 07:07 PM)motoarch Wrote: He could have tossed 8tds lastnight and 50 in the last 16 games and it wouldn’t matter.  Those that don’t like him never will.  The dalton scale fair or not will be his story throughout his career.

(09-14-2018, 10:15 PM)Go Cards Wrote: Never gave up on the kid or even said anything silly like he should be replaced by McAJ.

Anybody that judges any QB when their OL is as bad as ours was last year, is just not being fair at all.

OL stunk, run game stunk and somehow the QB is supposed to be good. Just craziness.  

A lot of people on here said he'd rebound as soon as the line was decent. Not great, but decent. Welp...

(09-15-2018, 01:14 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Fred's post is not cherry picking; it is selective.

Given his parameters that would put Andy just out of the top 10 in passer rating from last year. Seems about right as he has only been inside the top 10 once.

Here's to hoping this year makes it twice,

So that puts him just outside the top 10 among QB's, just as many have claimed. If he were around 20th, as others have claimed, shouldn't he be around 20th?