Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why exactly do we need John Ross to be good?
#90
(09-30-2018, 09:47 AM)kevin Wrote: That is the only way to look at it.  He didn't play his first year due to injuries, so he is just now in his first games looking very much like a rookie. Way too early to give up on #1 pick.  Here is the good news.  AJ Green and Boyd in first 3 games are both doing great so far in 2018.  Boyd is no surprise.  He was a big draft pick and came on strong in 2017, huge game winning TD to beat Ravens end of season.  Boyd has to be the #2 WR in 2018.  Green and Boyd are doing great. 

It doesn't matter how many games a player has missed. If they're with a professional team, in meetings, on the practice field, etc etc, after their first year, they are not rookies anymore. Not in any way, shape or form.

"Still basically a rookie" is just an excuse.





[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Why exactly do we need John Ross to be good? - rfaulk34 - 09-30-2018, 11:38 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)