Tony McRae....offsides

[*bengalfan74*]

(10-04-2018, 01:10 PM)McC Wrote: I'd say they do as much assuming as seeing, to be honest.  The speed and just overall congestion of the game makes it so.

Watched some of the replay yesterday.  They never showed a single replay of Kroft being held/interfered with on the interception, btw, just like it was in real time.  Found that odd.  No replay on a play like that, only from the pick forward through the tackle.

The roughing call on Lawson came from the turd in the white hat, the head turd.  He had to come running in to throw the flag.  From where he was, he did not have a view of the play, yet he's the one throwing the flag.  If he can't see the play, how can he see a penalty?

IMO, if you're gonna get so goofy over the roughing the passer call, teams should be able to challenge the call.  And there should most definitely be some consideration given to intent.  In other words, what the guy was aiming at and not just what did he hit.

Yep,

And I'm pretty sure the whit hat turd threw the flag for hands to the face. I heard one of the talking heads on NFL morning saying the refs need to view and hold judgment until they see the entirety of the play. Hart's hand slipped off the pads and up into his face for a nanosecond so he threw the flag instead of watching the entirety and seeing his hand come back off just as quick.

Same thing on the roughing the passer. He just saw the QB's head moving and assumed it was roughing.

Quit being so trigger happy !