10-04-2018, 02:43 PM
(10-04-2018, 02:31 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: If so, that's dumb. It is ok to emphasize their importance, and to be prepared to make a play on them but the overall scheme has to CREATE turnovers, not hope for them. With no pressure and too big a cushion in the back side, there is no chance to force turnovers. I heard something staggering about Atlanta: It was something to the effect of "Teams that have over 36 points and don't have any turnovers are 400-4-2 and two of them are the Falcons this year".
Hoping for turnovers is not a strategy. He needs to tighten up the back end and stop giving away the easy completions or the offense will have to score 35 or more every week.
Turnovers are great, but I think getting back to the bench after making stops on 3rd down is more important. My point is this, so I intercept the ball 15 times in the season, yet I allow a team to score over 30 points a game, which is better? Making stops or interceptions...
