10-09-2018, 08:47 PM
(10-09-2018, 01:59 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: A very valid point...
But then you look at Walter Jones, who wasn't much bigger at first (I think he started around 290-295, can't find the article, Munoz was 280) and he is the most legendary recent player, for giving up sacks (well, Whitworth's been better actually lol) and you wonder if he would've been even more dominant, in the 80s.
Its hard to say; its the whole Babe Ruth/Ted Williams argument too.
You can only really stack up competition at that time, as projections and hypothesis for future or past, just can't be done, really.
True.. I’m not knocking Munoz, just saying that it’s not a slam dunk fact. He was awesome against who he played against then though and that’s all one could ask of him.
