Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0
#24
(10-15-2018, 11:36 AM)Joelist Wrote: It isn’t so much the 3-4 (which we have the wrong personnel to run) as it is the soft zones we use, which our personnel are unsuited for. Remember than when our defense was good (under Zimmer) he did not use a lot of zone and instead played press man more.

If we had played press yesterday they would have won by 2 or 3 TDs

Press depends on getting pressure on the QB.

Ben would have really killed us yesterday if we had played man to man all over the field.

also- can someone who knows more then me explain why we have failed to cover TEs for 16 years???
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - bengals67 - 10-15-2018, 10:58 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - J24 - 10-15-2018, 11:08 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - J24 - 10-15-2018, 11:20 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Luvnit2 - 10-15-2018, 11:21 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - McC - 10-15-2018, 12:27 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Joelist - 10-15-2018, 11:36 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - J24 - 10-15-2018, 11:41 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - bengals67 - 10-15-2018, 01:43 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Joelist - 10-15-2018, 02:24 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Au165 - 10-15-2018, 02:42 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Daddy-O - 10-15-2018, 12:32 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - McC - 10-15-2018, 02:12 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - McC - 10-15-2018, 02:26 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - PhilHos - 10-15-2018, 02:35 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - McC - 10-15-2018, 02:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)