Tate, dez or both

[*wildcats forever*]

(10-28-2018, 12:40 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Might want to check your own logic.  The Bengals have never had to bring in a marquis player from FA to compensate for what AJ Green couldn't do.  The most they've had to do under AJ Green's watch at WR is bring in Brandon Lafell while Tyler Boyd needed time to develop.

When the team brought in TO, they had 2 high priced WR1s, and all that resulted in was 4 wins, and the continued diminishing of Chad Johnson.


However, we've digressed on a pointless tangent here, arguing about things that mean nothing.  I mean no offense to you, we're just jawing about football.  My whole point was to say that bringing in a Dez Bryant would be no more effective than when the team brought TO in.  The team has issues, for sure.  But none of those issues will go away by bringing in a high priced, drama queen WR.  If the team wanted to make a move before the trade deadline that made a significant difference, it would need to be for OL or LB.

Couldn't agree more, as it's more of the same from last year, which was more of the same from the previous year. Poor offensive blocking, pass protection, and weak schemes. Next year seems to be in jeopardy regarding the offense. Hell, I'm starting to wonder if this ever gets corrected by the current administration. It won't matter IF this defense doesn't start playing NFL quality football. If we need anyone new to catch a football, it would be LB/safety upgrades who don't have skillets for hands.