11-01-2018, 11:42 AM
(11-01-2018, 11:08 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: You're throwing out more and more bullshit!
Bell had more yards than Conner in that game!
I'll address the rest of your stupid post after you explain how that's outproducing Bell or you can just admit that your whole "argument" has been a scam and you've had no real substance to anything you've posted.
In case you're curious since you're obviously too stupid to look these things up on your own, here's the box score:
Le'Veon Bell
10
32
3.2
0
15
James Conner
4
11
2.8
0
5
Also, like I said, you once again ignored that all players that come in right away and produce don't do it against bad teams, but you kind of just reworded it to include now that they were also on good teams, which doesn't make any sense and ignores the fact that players come in all the time and produce right away against multiple opponents, good and bad, and on good teams and on bad teams.
I guess you have trouble reading. I said they didn't give the ball to Bell because he wasn't producing. When Conner was the starter this year, he was producing, which is why he was given the ball more. I was never comparing Bell to Conner in the SAME game. Of course the #1 back will get more carries than a rookie back-up. You keep misreading my posts and complaining about stuff I never said and then have the nerve to call me the stupid one. Do you even know how to read and form a valid argument? All you do is throw out bull crap and hope something sticks. I also never said only players that come in and produce right away do it against bad teams. I said even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while. That means any player can get lucky and produce. It's just those players are fewer and farther between that you can't rely on them. Next time learn to read what I actually type before you make yourself look foolish. I'm still waiting on you to tell me how you can honestly compare sprinters in the Olympics to football players? I guess that was more nonsense coming out of your mouth as well.
