11-24-2018, 08:05 PM
(11-24-2018, 07:25 PM)motoarch Wrote: I’m not so sure about these PFF grades. Hubbereds looked damn good to me.
PFF grades are akin to what a New York cabbie says about redlights : "Strictly for reference!". PFF might be a good place to start, or as a quick reference, but their value doesn't lie in allowing them to finalize your judgement.
When looking at the raw numbers that PFF presents, you quickly see how results stack up against others only. Nothing is accounted for in how those numbers were generated, like near misses, approach angle ever so slightly off, rookie mistakes .... or how athletically talented or football smart the player really is. There's a whole lot more in thoroughly evaluating a player, especially the younger, less-experienced ones. Using these numbers as a tracking measurement over a period of time is where their value comes in. That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
Some say you can place your ear next to his, and hear the ocean ....
![[Image: 6QSgU8D.gif?1]](https://i.imgur.com/6QSgU8D.gif?1)
