09-17-2015, 02:33 PM
(09-17-2015, 02:24 PM)djs7685 Wrote: It's not really unfair. A few of us have already brought up the reason many times. Taking someone's helmet off and then either striking them, grabbing their exposed head, pushing their head, or anything involving their exposed face/head is probably going to warrant the extra money.
I'd say there's a 98% chance that it had to do with that and a 2% chance that the extra money was because of incidents from 7-9 years ago.
Also, I'm pretty sure that it has been confirmed that he wasn't ejected because the officials didn't see every detail that happened until it was later reviewed. Don't quote me on that one though, but I thought I read that in one of the articles.
That's the point I made when I first saw it. The amount of deliberation in the retaliation is the most condemning of all the evidence in my mind. Taking a guy's helmet off before you lay down a retaliation is some blatant stuff. With that being said, how awesome was this?