12-04-2018, 12:40 PM
(12-04-2018, 12:19 PM)motoarch Wrote: Because even when he was playing well he was not a value add to the team. His lack of discipline and propensity to get injured and concussed kept him off the field. His lack of discipline also hurts the team’s reputation across the league and makes the team look bad. I never liked him and probably never will.
I don’t care if he’s not playing during the right era. That’s not my problem; it’s his. If this is what it takes for the team to move on from him then you’re damn right I love it. I’ve been sick of his antics for years.
So yes I’m glade to be right but not because it’s negative for the team. As far as I’m concerned it’s a positive because it means we potential move on from a anchor that’s just holding the team back.
We went from having 1 good LB to having 0 good LB. I see nothing positive about that.