12-28-2018, 06:14 PM
(12-28-2018, 06:12 PM)wolverine515151 Wrote: Their both analytic sites. They are not like cbs, fox espn bleacher report which are purely opinion sites. Andy is below average by any standard of measurement.
Driskel hasn't had any weapons and has put up better numbers than Andy Dalton with the same weapons. As far as I'm concerned, I'd give Driskel an incomplete on my assessment, because he has one of the the worst offensive lines in the league, no Green, no Boyd, no Eifert and no Kroft. He's started a measly 4 games and its too early to judge if he he's any good or not.
He's put up decent qb ratings and the offensive is a run first offense. He is is following the game plan that Lazor has implemented to run the ball a lot' that's why his yards are low.
He has a 85 qb rating in those 4 games and Dalton has a 74 with the same weapons.
Here some facts for you about Dalton. You need to stop it!!!!
QB RANKINGS SEASON AND PLAYOFF GAMES COMBINED
1 EXCELLENT SEASON 2 NO PLAYOFF GAMES
4 AVERAGE SEASONS 15 17 17 17 TWO PLAYOFF GAMES
3 BELOW AVERAGE SEASONS 25 25 22 TWO PLAYOFF GAMES
WITHOUT GREEN 80 QB RATING
PRIMETIME GAMES 69 QB RATING
PLAYOFFS 57 QB RATING
So you have actually watched driskel play and think hes our QB of the future.?
there is not enough laugh emotes to cover this.