Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was this a bad year to replace Marv?
#21
(01-08-2019, 03:33 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Marv got paid, had the best job security, and had more autonomy than most coaches. I think some underestimate the value of these things.

And I'm thrilled we didn't get McDaniels (who just announced he's staying in NE).

I think so too and yeah, McDaniels was the one guy i didn't want as an outside hire.

Didn't like what he did to the Colts and he was a bad HC in Denver.

He is purely an OC and most would do well with Brady at QB...
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Was this a bad year to replace Marv? - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 01-08-2019, 03:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)