Was this a bad year to replace Marv?

[*Nately120*]

(01-08-2019, 03:33 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Marv got paid, had the best job security, and had more autonomy than most coaches. I think some underestimate the value of these things.

Depends on how you look at it.  I can see a potential HC seeing Mike Brown's zeal for adhering to underwhelming coaches as a bit of a negative, too.  Marvin had to walk away after 3 losing seasons in a row and 16 years without a playoff win.

As I pointed out before, we can talk about it like it is a positive and we can admit that it might be but can you imagine our new HC saying "I took the job with the Bengals because it has the best job security."  Eep!